In his second post part of three part series dealing with
technology and the classroom, Gorman provides a list of websites for teachers
to use as resources to help them teach their students reading skills. One of my
favourite websites is Simple English Wikipedia which translates Wikipedia
articles into ‘simple’ English that can be easily grasped by younger students
and adults alike.
After reviewing the website, however, I wonder if it
incorporates the ‘spirit’ of the literacies. On one hand, it makes information
more accessible by providing articles in an easy to follow format. On the other
hand, this easy to follow format comes at the cost of quite a bit of valuable
information which is taken out in order for the article to read easier. The
‘critical’ aspect of Wikipedia articles are eliminated on this site; reducing
them to a set of historical facts.
As a future teacher, I’m split on whether to incorporate
this website as a resource for my students. Aside from Simple English
Wikipedia, this discussion raises the broader question about using Wikipedia as
an accepted resource within the classroom.
From: http://www.slideshare.net/jasonhoradam/using-pb-works-in-the-classroom
Pretty much everybody already uses Wikipedia, however when I
was in school, we were told never to cite it because the facts were not
validated. Recently, I’ve heard that Wikipedia has endeavoured to legitimize
their citations. Nevertheless, rather than using Wikipedia as a resource,
which in itself is demonstrates a type of technological literacy, I plan to
teach my students how to properly use search engines and databases. By
dedicating a few lessons to teaching students how to use search engines, I give
them the ‘conceptual’ tools for fostering their development of all the
literacies. Search engines and databases allow students to explore diverse
fields on knowledge, in turn promoting their capacity to access information
pertaining to the literacies.
***
Rather than finishing up Gorman’s series, I wanted to move
to a more recent post of his in which he discusses Sugata Mitra, a leading
educational scientist, whose research advocates the simple, but powerful
message: participation is preparation. Gorman discusses how the modern
educational paradigm assumes that learners need to be prepared before they can participate, and
that preparation is based on learners following a plan, and for teachers to measure the outcomes of that
plan.
I liked reading Sugata Mitra’s mantra because it seems like
the model I want to base my classroom off of. Participation is the vehicle in which all the
literacies are expressed. If students are not given the chance to participate,
or feel uncomfortable participating, the incorporation of the literacies is
futile. Without students have the ability to voice their opinions, the
literacies are reduced to empirical categories of knowledge which hold no
significance. It is through student voice that the literacies take on an intrinsic
value.
Sugata Mitra discussing self-teaching
| From: http://twbonline.pbworks.com |
Discussion and participation are the main vehicles for the literacies to be taught. One practice that I enjoyed as a student was having mock debates about issues because it developed my critical literacy by looking for the shortcomings in my peers arguments, and it also gave me an appreciation for my classmates opinions. Mock debates is a great way to incorporate the literacies because it provides a democratic avenue for participation, while also giving rise to new insights. Debates about financial decisions, multiculturalism, and environmentalism would be interesting to watch unfold in the classroom!
No comments:
Post a Comment